What happens in the courthouse...

Unless explicitly noted otherwise, this blog represents my own opinions, not those of any organization (like the Kittitas County Democratic Party) that I might be involved with.

Feel free to join the conversation: welcome aboard!

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor,

I read “Community Members Look Forward to 2011” in Saturday’s Daily Record while following the awful news from Arizona about the attempted assassination of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and the killing and wounding of 19 others. There appears to be no political motivation, only insanity, behind the attack.

Even so, my thoughts went back to the past couple of years in our own community. I thought about the drawing of President Obama with crosshairs on his forehead that briefly appeared on an Ellensburg business owned by a Republican Precinct Committee Officer.1 Of course I thought about the Manweller-Huber incident at the radio station, which started with Mr. Manweller’s fabricated on-air story about Linda Huber’s behavior at the Rodeo Parade.2

National events affected our community, too. We witnessed Sarah Palin’s unceasing and calculated use of violent verbal and graphical imagery, and Sharron Angle’s “Second Amendment remedy” comment.3

I thought about the three discussions of health care reform that I organized in the fall of 2009, after a summer of frightening town hall meetings that were disrupted by Tea Party members. Jimmie Applegate graciously accepted my invitation to be the speaker at the third meeting. The first meeting drew nearly 100 people, a few of them disruptive Tea Party members, including Kirk Groening.4 I thought about how I had been too naïve to invite the police, but an officer had come anyway. I thought about how someone tried to get library administrators to withdraw permission for more meetings in the Hal Holmes Center.

The “Look Forward” article also included recollections of 2010, and featured comments from Mr. Applegate and Mr. Groening; not one, but two other interviewees mentioned the Manweller-Huber incident.5 Mr. Applegate recalled that people had said mean things about Republicans on Daily Record comment forums, and Mr. Groening remembered the Tea Party candidates’ forum in Kittitas. I remember that forum, too. Mr. Applegate was the timekeeper, and one of the speakers was a Tea Party candidate for the state House who was running against the principled Republican incumbent solely because of his vote in favor of a gay rights bill.

When the unthinkable happens, it’s hard not to remember things like this. The violence in Arizona doesn’t seem to have been political, but it reminds us to behave, at a minimum, in ways we won’t be ashamed to have recalled later.

Steve Verhey
Ellensburg

1This person, while a frequent Daily Record letter writer, isn't a public person in the same way as the other people named here, so I won't name him. I don't know how long the poster/drawing had been up when I saw it; it disappeared while I went to get a camera. I should have called the Secret Service immediately.
2I wrote briefly about this incident on this blog.
3Is it fair to bring this up? Yes: I am not suggesting that Palin's or Angle's behavior had anything to do with this tragic incident, but it is factual to say that they did behave in certain ways that are relevant to a discussion of violence.
4Here is the Daily Record's article about the first meeting. And here is a Guest Comment I published in the Daily Record before the third meeting.
5One of the people who mentioned the Manweller-Huber incident directly linked it to the recent rise of incivility.

7 comments:

  1. Looks like someone is a little bitter they only got 32% of the vote. I usually ignore the garbage you write (as did all the peer reviewers of your unpublished research) but you have slandered so many I needed to note it. The person with the Obama target is not a GOP pco. He ran. He lost big. Second, there was no fabrication of the Huber incident. Both Hubers admitted to Thierry actions in court. Read the transcripts. And finally, try to lose gracefully next time Steve.

    Matt M

    ReplyDelete
  2. I assume Matt M = Matt Manweller. Thanks for your comment.
    1) The election is ancient history, but I think you need to check your math. I plan to continue behaving like a responsible citizen, and I trust you to do the same.
    2) The Obama target guy was a GOP PCO at the time of the incident. You appear to know who he is, which is interesting -- were there any consequences for him at the time? If not, why not? How about at least an apology on behalf of the party?
    3) If it's true you didn't fabricate (or at least overstate) the Huber incident, you need to do a better job of getting the word out.
    4) I'll leave it to our readers to determine who is bitter.
    5) Let me know if you'd like me to remove your embarrassing comment.

    ReplyDelete
  3. No need to respond any further. I don't think anyone reads your blog anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Okay...

    Someone who "doesn't" read your blog, reads your blog and then takes the time to comment. Twice.

    Let's start with "Thierry actions":

    http://definitions.uslegal.com/search/?q=thierry+action&ex=1

    And let's address the "Peer Review" issue, shall we?

    What are the "Peer Reviews" of having someone on the CWU Faculty who conducts themselves in public as has Mr. Manweller? The September incident, radio show, columns, books, appearances, etc. may "go down well" with those who slaughter pigs, empty septic tanks or drink themselves into a stupor every night, but how has this cumulative pattern of behavior reflected onto CWU? Is this what the Administration and Faculty Senate wants to portray as acceptable at CWU to the entire academic community? I personally am of the opinion that CWU has its own version of Colorado's Ward Churchill. Something not to be proud of.

    Bitterness and grace. Twice this guy's actions have harmed the Campaigns of Dino Rossi. He's the one who's bitter because he realizes the damage he's done. And grace? He's is no position to ask grace from others as he's been incapable of demonstrating or giving it himself. Hollow and angry men are always like that.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Steve, I read your letter. Both sides of the political spectrum are to blame. Remember all the Bush haters? Bush with a bullet hole in his head, Bush being decapitated? Both sides have their radical element, it's dishonest of you to point out one side over the other. I voted for you but a retract my vote after this.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for your comment. Earlier in the week a gentleman called me at home to say much the same thing. We had a very nice conversation, and by the end I think he was just about ready to vote for me again.

    However, as I indicated to Dr. Manweller, I was (and am) writing as a citizen, not as a political candidate. For this reason, I avoided any mention of the recent campaign, except that I happened to go to the Tea Party campaign forum.

    My recollections in the letter were limited to our local community and the past couple of years. Of course if I had seen the things you mention, I would have added them to my list, but I didn't.

    The problem with the 'both sides do it' argument is that two wrongs don't make a right. Certainly both/all sides need to tone their rhetoric down, and the last sentence of my letter was directed at everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Two wrongs don't make a right. But only highlighting one group is not correct either. There are wacko's on both sides and they serve no purpose other than to inflame. These radicals need to be ignored and moved passed and highlighting their actions gives them the attention they desire. Just ignore them. I hope your run again, I like what you add to the conversation. Thanks

    ReplyDelete